Post

Human Nature Is Still Nature: Power, Victimhood, and the Animal Kingdom Within Society

Human Nature Is Still Nature: Power, Victimhood, and the Animal Kingdom Within Society

In modern discourse, particularly in spaces shaped by social justice and progressive ideology, we often view human behavior through moral binaries: victim and abuser, good and bad, virtuous and corrupt. But this lens, while well-intentioned, flattens human complexity and fails to account for one critical reality: human social dynamics are not separate from nature—they are nature, expressed in language, ideology, and performance.

To understand the deeper truths of our interactions, we must peel back the moral veneers and begin to see human society for what it is—an intricate ecosystem mirroring the predator-prey dynamics, parasitic relationships, mating rituals, symbiosis, and hierarchies of the animal kingdom.

The Myth of Moral Purity

One of the most corrosive ideas we’ve absorbed is the notion that victimhood equates to moral purity. This myth not only distorts our ability to see people clearly but also creates a dangerous incentive structure—an economy of abuse, where being harmed can be converted into social currency.

In this economy, the narrative of being a victim can be weaponized to justify behavior that would otherwise be unjustifiable. People begin to leverage their trauma—not as a path to healing, but as a shield from accountability. They invoke their suffering to deflect criticism and manipulate dynamics. And because our cultural conditioning associates victimhood with innocence, this manipulation often goes unchallenged.

What’s often overlooked is that abuse victims can become abusers. Trauma, left unprocessed, can breed entitlement, control, and cruelty. But when someone’s identity is built on the sanctity of their victimhood, any attempt to hold them accountable becomes an existential threat. It’s a paradox that traps both parties—the one seeking fairness, and the one hiding behind their wounds.

The Abuse Role Cycle: Victim to Abuser

Unresolved trauma often creates a recursive loop: people either replay the role of the victim in new abusive scenarios or adopt the role of abuser when faced with someone who refuses to victimize them. This is rarely acknowledged in mainstream dialogue because it challenges the comforting notion that trauma always produces empathy and understanding.

When someone decides to walk away from a toxic relationship early—before it escalates—they are often demonized. Their self-protection becomes an affront to those still trapped in cycles of abuse. It’s a brutal irony: the person setting healthy boundaries is framed as cruel, while the person pushing those boundaries is viewed as a wounded soul deserving endless compassion.

This gaslighting effect destabilizes well intentioned people. They begin questioning their value, their judgment, and their worth. They start to believe they were the problem—not because it’s true, but because the cultural narrative has conditioned them to overextend empathy and under-recognize manipulation when it comes cloaked in victimhood.

Opportunism in Virtue-Based Systems

There’s a common belief that movements based on justice, equality, and progress are inherently good. But this belief grossly underestimates the adaptability of human opportunism. Systems—regardless of their ideological foundation—are still systems. And every system creates roles, hierarchies, and incentive structures. Wherever there is power, there will be those who seek to manipulate it.

Narcissists, sociopaths, and high-functioning manipulators are not rare. They are not the outliers we wish they were. And when moral language becomes the dominant social currency, these individuals simply adapt. They don’t need to be loud or visible. In fact, many thrive behind the veil of innocence, fragility, or virtue. They exploit the system not by confronting it, but by mimicking its values and infiltrating it from within.

People find niches. They mimic vulnerability. They present as harmless while consolidating influence. And because society has equated trauma with righteousness, it becomes difficult—if not taboo—to question any aspect of their behavior.

Human Social Structures Mirror Natural Ecosystems

We like to imagine that human society has transcended nature. But this is delusion. In truth, our social structures are elaborate expressions of the same biological dynamics that govern the animal kingdom.

Consider the parallels:

  • Predator/Prey Dynamics: Emotional predators seek out vulnerable individuals—those with poor boundaries, unresolved trauma, or a deep need for validation. They feed off energy, attention, resources.
  • Parasitic Relationships: Some people attach themselves to others for emotional, financial, or social gain. They drain more than they give. Their presence erodes vitality, often subtly and slowly.
  • Symbiosis: Healthy relationships are mutually beneficial. Both parties grow, thrive, and support one another. These are the true bonds worth protecting.
  • Courtship Rituals: Humans perform too—through language, social signaling, posturing, or ideological alignment. Whether it’s virtue signaling, aesthetic branding, or curated vulnerability, courtship is everywhere.
  • Camouflage and Mimicry: Manipulators often present as fragile, humble, or righteous to avoid scrutiny. They hide in plain sight, gaining trust and influence before revealing their true motives.
  • Dominance Hierarchies: Every social group has them. Whether overt or covert, power concentrates. Sometimes it’s based on charisma, other times on moral capital or perceived virtue.
  • Illusion, Camouflage, and Deceit: Just as species in nature use coloration, posturing, and stealth to deceive predators or lure prey, humans use image curation, ideological mimicry, and emotional manipulation to mask true intent.
  • Strength in Numbers and Subterfuge: Like flocks, herds, or packs that protect individuals through cohesion, people in social groups often use unity as a strategy—sometimes for support, other times to dominate, silence, or exclude outsiders.
  • Manipulation, Warfare, and Conquest: Social warfare exists in subtle forms—psychological games, reputational attacks, clout competition, and ideological domination. Conquest and subjugation don’t always require weapons—they happen through influence, persuasion, and social engineering.
  • Imbalance and Extinction: Just as nature suffers when ecosystems fall out of balance, social groups deteriorate when dynamics are parasitic, coercive, or predatory. People burn out, communities fracture, and healthy systems collapse.

These aren’t metaphors. They are patterns—observable, replicable, real. And understanding them gives you a strategic advantage in navigating complex social systems.

Discernment Over Idealism

To survive—and more importantly, to thrive—in human ecosystems, you need a discerning eye. You need to see beneath the surface. People reveal themselves not through declarations, but through patterns of behavior over time.

Ask yourself:

  • How does this person respond to boundaries?
  • What do they do when they’re not being praised?
  • How do they treat those they can’t gain from?
  • What patterns emerge under stress or conflict?

The mistake many people make is assuming the best too quickly—offering trust without first observing character over time. In reality, most individuals operate from a place of self-interest to varying degrees. The real question isn’t whether someone is self-serving—it’s whether their self-interest aligns with mutual respect or infringes upon your autonomy. One of the hardest but most liberating truths to accept is that aligned incentives are often the most reliable metric of relationship quality. It matters less why a person does what they do, and more that their why is self-sustaining and compatible with your own goals and values.

There are no inherently “good” or “bad” people. Some people behave well most of the time. Others behave poorly most of the time. What matters is patterned behavior in varied contexts, not a snapshot based on charm, ideology, attraction, or trauma story.

Exiting Systems That Don’t Serve You

Perhaps the most radical and self-loving act is to walk away from systems that degrade, diminish, or distort you. You don’t owe allegiance to a structure just because it claims to be just. You don’t owe yourself to a dynamic simply because someone else says you do.

Every structure has trade-offs. Some are worth it. Others are soul-depleting. Learn to assess:

  • What is rewarded here?
  • What is punished?
  • What am I expected to sacrifice to belong?
  • What do I gain by staying?

And most importantly: what does it cost me to stay?

If the cost is your sanity, self-respect, or clarity, the answer is simple: leave. Build new ecosystems. Seek out symbiotic bonds. Construct your life around mutual respect, not guilt or obligation.

Conclusion: See the Core

People can only pretend for so long. Eventually, the patterns emerge. The facade cracks. The camouflage slips. Your job is not to fix or save anyone—it’s to observe, discern, and decide whether they belong in your ecosystem.

Human nature is still nature. And once you start seeing the animal kingdom mirrored in the social kingdom, everything becomes clearer. You stop reacting blindly. You start choosing wisely.

Be clear-eyed. Be kind—but not naive. Be discerning—but not jaded. And above all, respect your own boundaries enough to walk away when the structure doesn’t serve your evolution.

Because sometimes the most evolved thing you can do is simply… leave the jungle.

This post is licensed under CC BY 4.0 by the author.